> But that analysis ignores the billions of people whose lives will likely end because of global warming. ...that number is not even remotely plausible. Where

> But that analysis ignores the billions of people whose lives will likely end because of global warming. ...that number is not even remotely plausible. Where did you get billions from? Example: 250,000 extra deaths estimated between 2030 and 2050. That means an extra 5 million deaths in that period (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-cha...). Another: 83 million extra deaths by 2100, and I suspect that's under the more pessimistic scenario (https://www.forbes.com/sites/dishashetty/2021/07/30/climate-change-would-cause-83-million-excess-deaths-by-2100/?sh=256b003d45c4 https://www.forbes.com/sites/dishashetty/2021/07/30/climate-...) Action on climate change is very slow, but happening. Climate change is not going to be even remotely as close to as bad as you appear to think it will be.