2 ms·
My interpretation of the article was not that they would get a one time bonus of $250,000, but that they would get $50,000 every five years for a total of $250k
by BadCookie 15y ago
My interpretation of the article was not that they would get a one time bonus of $250,000, but that they would get $50,000 every five years for a total of $250k after 25 years.
I agree with your other points, though.
- droithomme 15y agoHm, that's a good point and would be a better system than what I was interpreting it to be since there wouldn't be the gut feeling of a wage loss after 5 years. BTW, I should clarify I'm not intrinsically opposed at all to anything in the article, I'm just pondering about the design of the system and its potential advantages and drawbacks compared to other possible incentive systems. Ultimately such human incentive plans are unpredictable in advance of being first done and thus the proof is in the pudding, it will be an interesting experiment to see carried through and see what the results are.