3 ms·
No, they already knew about the dangers of fallout. "the AEC established Project Plowshare amid growing public and political opposition to nuclear programs. Nu
by pmoriarty 4y ago
No, they already knew about the dangers of fallout.
"the AEC established Project Plowshare amid growing public and political opposition to nuclear programs. Nuclear tests routinely produced unacceptably high levels of fallout, and the subsequent appearance in drinking water, milk, meat, and produce of strontium-90, cesium-137, and other cancer-causing radioactive elements had generated a movement demanding a worldwide ban on airborne nuclear tests."
But "the AEC believed the region [in Alaska where the harbor would be created with nukes] to be an uninhabited Arctic wasteland."
"Environmental scientists, as well as many Alaskan locals, were not sold. They doubted AEC estimates that a bomb crater harbor would be handling $176 million in annual exports within 25 years. Cape Thompson adjoined large deposits of coal and oil, but it also was iced in nine months out of every 12."
"And the cape was only 30 miles south of Point Hope, an Inuit village whose residents subsisted on the region’s abundant wildlife. Irked by critics, Teller vented to economist George Rogers, "We are not interested in preserving the Eskimo as a hunter. We are interested in giving him the opportunity of becoming a coal miner.""[1]
[1] - https://www.historynet.com/an-explosive-plan-to-use-atoms-for-peace/ https://www.historynet.com/an-explosive-plan-to-use-atoms-fo...
- GekkePrutser 4y ago> "We are not interested in preserving the Eskimo as a hunter. We are interested in giving him the opportunity of becoming a coal miner." Wow and they say old times were better lol They were so careless with nature and people
- throwaway0a5e 4y agoYou're only saying that because of the political baggage that surrounds treatment of native Americans and coal mining and the way we view those things today. The premise that a big infrastructure project will create a bunch of economic opportunity in the local area and people will be better off for it is not a controversial one.
- pmoriarty 4y ago"The premise that a big infrastructure project will create a bunch of economic opportunity in the local area and people will be better off for it is not a controversial one." It certainly is controversial. Some look at this process as economic opportunity, others as indentured servitude and exploitation. There's been a long and sad history of such developments leaving the areas where it happens a polluted, barren carcass.