>Go ahead, show me the carve out for, I dunno, inaccessible works or something that overrides this. The IA's argument is that it's covered under section 107 as

>Go ahead, show me the carve out for, I dunno, inaccessible works or something that overrides this. The IA's argument is that it's covered under section 107 as "fair use" as it's a nonprofit educational act with seemingly no negative effect on the value of the work. You can disagree but you're tone is that you're absolutely right and anyone who doubts it is denying reality.