My university philosophy 101 critical reasoning course taught us to use this kind of abduction or reverse deduction to take the conclusion of somebody's argumen

My university philosophy 101 critical reasoning course taught us to use this kind of abduction or reverse deduction to take the conclusion of somebody's argument and infer what premises might be needed to support it but are not being stated or are hidden or unexamined. A a very useful skill when in discussion with someone else who studied critical reasoning X'D