And, if you actually read the Lancet study and understand statistical estimates, it is clear that the Lancet study does not say this at all. There is no mentio

And, if you actually read the Lancet study and understand statistical estimates, it is clear that the Lancet study does not say this at all. There is no mention of long-term immune depression in the abstract, because there is no statistically significant support for that conclusion. After 8 months, the line they show does go below zero (suggesting more infections in vaccinated people) but the error bars include zero, supporting the more sensible conclusion that at some point, the vaccine is not effective. But there is no evidence that the vaccine actually raises risk, which is the argument proposed.