I mean, you aren't wrong. But this is akin to saying you don't need a memory safe language, because you can decide what is best for your applications memory ne

I mean, you aren't wrong. But this is akin to saying you don't need a memory safe language, because you can decide what is best for your applications memory needs. That is, I think the ask is more of "why haven't we come up with something that is a bit better at mitigating risks, here?"