3 ms·
I would, especially for people who use their computers mostly for business. Except for USB and PNP support, Windows 2000 is inferior to NT4SP2. However the Py
by bayareaguy 18y ago
I would, especially for people who use their computers mostly for business. Except for USB and PNP support, Windows 2000 is inferior to NT4SP2.
However the Python guys are probably doing the right thing here because the right approach to making windows based business systems reliable is to disable everything possible on them, isolate them as much as you can, get things working and NOT upgrade them unless you absolutely have to.
- briansmith 18y agoRE: "Windows 2000 is inferior to NT4SP2" Windows XP SP2 is basically the minimum version of Windows that you can use and expect a reasonable user experience. That includes the ability to install new (recently released) software. If you insist on old operating systems, then you should expect to run old applicatoins on them.
- rbanffy 18y agoWill there be a 3.0 for VMS?
- gaius 18y agoI hope so, since it's actually 9 years younger than Unix ;-)
- eru 18y agoRobert Metcalf [the inventor of Ethernet] says that if something comes along to replace Ethernet, it will be called “Ethernet”, so therefore Ethernet will never die. Unix has already undergone several such transformations. -- Ken Thompson [from http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s02.html http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s02.html]