3 ms·
Unless you've tested this theory in court it might not be true. It's almost certainly not as cut and dry as you make it seem. Many companies put the same people
by henryfjordan 4y ago
Unless you've tested this theory in court it might not be true. It's almost certainly not as cut and dry as you make it seem. Many companies put the same people oncall who write the code, meaning it literally is an essential function of a software developer to provide oncall support. You'd have to argue in court that it's not really essential but it would be situationally dependent.
That said, I'd hope most places would be willing to accommodate you. Places I've worked have always treated oncall as a kinda optional "right thing to do". I've never seen anyone punished for missing an alert. You'd have a good argument if that were the case at your company but that approach to oncall is not universal.
- kayodelycaon 4y agoThat would be one of the exceptions. For example, high-frequency trading firms always need developers on call while they are actively operating. Keeping those systems running correctly is essential to their role in the company. Same with small companies who have no other staff, assuming they even have enough employees (15) to be under ADA. :) For the more common scenario of on-call rotation, it would be very difficult to make that argument because other people can take up the disabled person's shifts.