> C++ has virtually zero tooling CMake, Meson, Waf, Conan, Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, CLion, Intel VTune, GDB, LLDB, XCode, Artifactory, SonarQube, cla

> C++ has virtually zero tooling CMake, Meson, Waf, Conan, Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, CLion, Intel VTune, GDB, LLDB, XCode, Artifactory, SonarQube, clang-tidy, clang-format, astyle, Incredibuild... > Comparing CMake to cargo is like comparing fifth century fireworks to the Space Shuttle You are wrong here. Cargo serves a set of fixed "this-is-how-to-do-it" thing. In C++ you can build anything. I do not mean it is better, but C++ software already exists and that is the solution that it works better for it. :) > and the committee is not interested in ever working on that https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0822r0.pdf https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p08... Interoperability effort for modules: https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr