5 ms·
The simple work around is to provide lower quality of service to all of the platforms features and claim it is the only way to achieve _effective_ interoperabil
by enos_feedler 4y ago
The simple work around is to provide lower quality of service to all of the platforms features and claim it is the only way to achieve _effective_ interoperability without jeopardizing the user experience
- Gareth321 4y agoThey have lots of qualifiers around access and service standards. It's 230 pages and quite comprehensive. I'm sure Apple and Google will try to get creative, but these simple examples of potential malicious compliance are already covered.
- enos_feedler 4y agoI am not speaking with regards to malicious intent. I actually mean the scenario where providing a certain level of access does in fact degrade the user experience. Take for instance if US carriers were required to give all MNVO full 5G access with unlimited data simply because the carriers themselves sell this kind of capability directly to customers. This might put burden onto the network that just makes it terrible for everyone. We wouldn’t want that kind of regulation. I am just wondering if this will degrade the phone experience in a material way and the only recourse will be to uninstall apps.
- diffeomorphism 4y ago> The simple work around is to (lie) That seems like dubious advice.
- enos_feedler 4y agoNobody said lie
- diffeomorphism 4y agoIntentionally claim untruth (for personal benefit) == lie So, yes they very much did.