3 ms·
I'd say the issue for people who are inclined to pick the first arrangement is one of trust. If you don't trust your employer not to abuse the second arrangeme
by DoughnutHole 4y ago
I'd say the issue for people who are inclined to pick the first arrangement is one of trust.
If you don't trust your employer not to abuse the second arrangement then you'd be a fool to accept it. With the first arrangement the employer is incentivised not to exceed the agreed upon expected number of on-call weeks because they are financially penalised for additional on-call time. With the second arrangement the employer can demand as much on-call time as they think they can get away with.
It's really a case of if you expect your relationship with your employer to be in some way adversarial - if you trust your employer not to screw you than go ahead, but you can't necessarily reliably make that judgement going into a new job.
- bornfreddy 4y agoI am firmly in the camp that would pick the first arrangement, but not because of (lack of) trust. It is partially due to psychological effect on me (get out of bed, you are compensated for this) and partially because the incentives of the employer are better aligned with mine. They should view 24/7 operation as something that costs money, so that they are more willing to invest in robust solutions.