4 ms·
It's probably not possible legally. I think state and federal laws and regulations require that a properly trained and licensed pharmacist be involved in some
by tgflynn 4y ago
It's probably not possible legally. I think state and federal laws and regulations require that a properly trained and licensed pharmacist be involved in some way in the handling of every prescription. From a legal perspective it would be like trying to fully automate a doctor's office.
- noasaservice 4y agoNaturally, you're completely true. However, there doesn't seem to be a rule that each state's auto-pharm couldn't hire a small panel of pharmacists and vet them for any sort of religious garbage, and have all approvals go through them. It would be the equivalent of having a surgical tech doing a surgery under the guise (and license) of a surgeon. And that surprises many people, but doing that is completely legal. The surgeon accepts the risk of their surg tech doing so.
- Dracophoenix 4y agoSurgeons have a lot more leeway in their methods. They don't have to sign a consent form or contract for each incision they make, so the comparison isn't apt. Even if pharmaceutical licensing isn't an issue for you, pharmaceutical supply will be as it must go through the FDA.
- abrylov 4y agoIt is illegal in the US to vet potential employees based on religion.
- mattpallissard 4y agoObligatory: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_wjlfJ65U https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_wjlfJ65U