4 ms·
No, but it looks very interesting. So this would replace TeamViewer and Steam RemotePlay at the same time, not bad. Just not that big of a fan about the pricing
by 4ggr0 4y ago
No, but it looks very interesting. So this would replace TeamViewer and Steam RemotePlay at the same time, not bad. Just not that big of a fan about the pricing. $100 per year just so that my SO can play on their PC at their home, while I'm not at my home, seems a bit steep.
Yeah, my use-case is very specific, I know. I don't even game remote myself, but if I'm on holidays or at work and my partner wants to game from their home, I need a way to be able to power on my PC and everything necessary for it to work. A complete niche, first-world problem :)
- thegeomaster 4y agoI myself use the free tier, didn't miss any of the paid features. It's easily the best, lowest-latency, most no-hassle remote desktop tool I've ever used. Once they add Linux hosting I won't mind shelling out some cash either.
- yamazakiwi 4y agoMy desktop machine is not in my living room but I like to watch shows on my large TV while gaming from the couch. I use Parsec and remote to my desktop from my shitty laptop and get much better performance than I would just gaming with an integrated chipset and it's portable. Also, plugging in a usb controller into my laptop automatically controls the desktop without any setup. Only bad thing I can say is that they got bought by Unity last year and Unity is now merging with IronSource :/