4 ms·
The recommendation does not hold up when scrutinised. MDN is also third-party, thus equally unofficial. The official sources are IANA and IETF. The quality is
by bmn__ 4y ago
The recommendation does not hold up when scrutinised.
MDN is also third-party, thus equally unofficial. The official sources are IANA and IETF.
The quality is objectively worse compared with webconcepts. It's not immediately visible where a status code originates from, and when you follow through to the detail document, you can see that the outdated RFC 2616 is referenced.
- hk1337 4y agoMore official than hosted by some rando on GitHub pages with a .info domain.
- bmn__ 4y agoThe "rando" is a long term contributor to Web specifications. The choice of top-level domain has zero significance, as I said previously, the only measure of official(?:ness|ity) is where the information originates from.