3 ms·
Disappointing, yes. Except this is the norm in science if we look back historically. Theories that were accepted for hundreds of years are replaced with more ac
by blinding-streak 4y ago
Disappointing, yes. Except this is the norm in science if we look back historically. Theories that were accepted for hundreds of years are replaced with more accurate representations through the scientific method. For example, planetary epicycles.
- aerostable_slug 4y agoAgreed, but I think the more apt comparison is phlogiston.
- Maursault 4y ago> Except this is the norm in science if we look back historically. Science, for better or worse, is paradigmatic. The paradigm is strong and drives careers. Only when the paradigm is toppled and a new paradigm established does Science begin to advance in what will be ultimately seen historically as a leap or bound, metaphorically of course.