> You know… suggesting that someone that they’re delusional and uninformed isn’t a very charitable way to discuss anything online. I think there's no reason to

> You know… suggesting that someone that they’re delusional and uninformed isn’t a very charitable way to discuss anything online. I think there's no reason to exaggerate what I said just because I don't love your pet principle as much as you do. Here's what I explicitly describe as being part of well-written (or poorly written) code, which has very little to do with FP vs OOP vs procedural: "Poor naming, branch/loop structuring, scoping, data modeling/normalization, module structuring, logging, and dependency selection/integration" >The phrase “well-written” may be doing a lot of lifting here I think if you read the entire comment, you'd see it doing a lot less lifting because I explicitly detail what "well-written" is. And I think it is cross-language.