3 ms·
>I humbly suggest, get over such vitriol you're reading vitriol where I have none. It was a statement of fact followed by a statement of opinion. There was no
by LegitShady 4y ago
>I humbly suggest, get over such vitriol
you're reading vitriol where I have none. It was a statement of fact followed by a statement of opinion. There was no vitriol involved except what you're projecting into it.
>maybe get some professional help.
Maybe now is a time to take a moment of deep self reflection and think how humbly you might suggest something, and who has vitriol
>Quoting guidelines
applies directly to your attempt to say that anyone who disagrees needs mental health. This should raise some deep questions of self reflection in you, rather than thinking that everyone else is shallow while your post is not.
There was nothing shallow about my post that your post is not equally if not more shallow.
- srvmshr 4y agoIf this wasn't vitriol, it definitely lacks much common courtesy afforded to other users here. I did not start this. And I am not sure how you can consider your initial post 'just fine'. As I said elsewhere, I am here to respectfully engage and learn something. Engaging with this post with you doesn't give me any new insight - neither on Twitter nor on common etiquettes.
- samoppy 4y ago
- ImPostingOnHN 4y agohi, totally different person here, I also read vitriol in your post, which is not mutually exclusive with sharing facts or opinions given the multiple confirmations of this, it's possible that you don't realize the vitriol in your post, or mischaracterize it as not vitriol, or just are unwilling to admit to it to others or yourself before you respond to this post, please ask yourself if you've internalized the critical feedback you've recieved from multiple users, and are not going to simply act defensive again