4 ms·
> YouTube is free to set terms for monetization contracts, including granting attribution to third parties under their system. This is obviously not the case.
by masswerk 4y ago
> YouTube is free to set terms for monetization contracts, including granting attribution to third parties under their system.
This is obviously not the case. This is really the entire point of having Content ID in the first place: Had YT been free to monetize under their own contracts whoever uploaded an episode of Sponge Bob, Viacom wouldn't have had a case.
- Double_a_92 4y agoI think the argument was about things that are in the public domain. It's not illegal for Youtube to give the revenue from those contents to some random 3rd party.