4 ms·
You're right, this is unreasonable. Please teach a class to 5-year-olds on intermittent fasting and why they should learn to do it to properly enjoy a sportsbal
by xracy 4y ago
You're right, this is unreasonable. Please teach a class to 5-year-olds on intermittent fasting and why they should learn to do it to properly enjoy a sportsball game.
It's only 3hrs without food if you eat immediately before and after the game. Which, when you're trying to corral small children, means that there is likely time on either side of it.
But also, WTF, If you eat 3 meals a day you go 5h20m on a 16h day without food. And 56% of that is unreasonable for a child to feel hungry during? You're a special kind of inconsiderate at the very least with this comment. In actuality your comment mostly reads as malicious and bad.
- ahtihn 4y agoIt's super common to have lunch at 12 and dinner at 8 without any food in-between. 3 hours without food is completely normal. Actually believing that you can't have fun for 3 hours because food isn't available (or too expensive) is weird. Even for 5 year olds. Of course you still need something to drink during that time.
- xracy 4y agoHuh, super common. What's your source for that info? Most of the 5-YO I know go to sleep at 8, so that doesn't pass the smell test for me. Where in the world are you that the average dinner time is 8pm? Also, I don't think anyone is saying you can't do it, just that most people doing it wouldn't consider it "fun" or "an enjoying evening out" if they have a 5-YO who is screaming cause they're hungry.