3 ms·
I do like a bit of very very expensive energy with a 1/3625 chance of causing disaster every year: https://scitechdaily.com/likelihood-of-nuclear-accident-200-t
by pydry 4y ago
I do like a bit of very very expensive energy with a 1/3625 chance of causing disaster every year: https://scitechdaily.com/likelihood-of-nuclear-accident-200-times-greater-than-previously-thought/ https://scitechdaily.com/likelihood-of-nuclear-accident-200-...
(for those who think that estimate is far too pessimistic - dont try to convince me - try talking some sense into those pesky insurance companies who absolutely positively refuse to insure nuclear power without a liability cap of $375 mil or 0.04% the cost of 1 Fukushima)
- ianai 4y agoSo you want people to convince actuaries because you think the actuarial risk profile is incorrect before you’ll admit the perceived risk profile is incorrect? Seems circular and possibly a distraction. Just use nuclear.
- pydry 4y agoI think the actuarial risk profile is probably more correct than the general public's press-release driven risk perception.