3 ms·
The government can't direct a company to do surveillance that the government itself couldn't do. If the government were just going to flaunt the law anyways th
by mpyne 4y ago
The government can't direct a company to do surveillance that the government itself couldn't do. If the government were just going to flaunt the law anyways there'd be easier ways to get after the data in these buckets. And none of this would insulate the government from backlash anyways.
Likewise, if you're Bezos and you have unfettered access to PRISM-tier data that AWS employees are just going to say "OK!" for, you don't need to buy Ring. Just grab the data! It's sitting on your S3 buckets!
At most the government might be able to use data that Amazon would willingly turnover for whatever reason, assuming they're not contractually prevented from that, but you can't hardly build a surveillance program around the idea that Amazon might allow you to luck into data you need.
- astrange 4y agoWhat do you think "PRISM-tier data" is? PRISM is just a database where they put the results of subpoenas. It's not a super cool spy program.
- uoaei 4y ago> The government can't direct a company to do surveillance that the government itself couldn't do. What does this sentence mean re: legal text?