3 ms·

Please, don't give ideas to whomever among their lawyers reads this later :-). We don't need another Schrems II..

• dataflow 4y ago
  Sorry!
  • dinvlad 4y ago
    I think lawyers probably miss a lot of these technicalities (which explains why they can require something as technically unreasonable as Schrems II), but I just wonder if someone more technical can actually push for something like that, to win themselves some questionable points, in the name of improving privacy.
    • closewith 4y ago
      What a bizarrely dismissive comment. You could just as easily say that some developers miss a lot of the legal technicalities, which explains why they believe Schrems II is an unreasonable ruling.
      • dinvlad 4y ago
        Now I don't understand your comment, sorry :-)
    • namibj 4y ago
      What's the unreasonable thing? Not having your data HQ in a place vulnerable to unrelated government overreach?