4 ms·
Yes, but it's not really for the fishes' benefits. It's so we can eat them.
by zach_garwood 4y ago
Yes, but it's not really for the fishes' benefits. It's so we can eat them.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoNot really. Both examples came down to environmental regulation and the Endangered Species Act superceding water rights in the courts. Commercial and recreational fishing didn't really have anything to do with it