3 ms·
and somehow > "Ars Technica is pretty good, partly because so many of their writers are experts with advanced degrees." passes the test for "real substance"?
by clairity 4y ago
and somehow
> "Ars Technica is pretty good, partly because so many of their writers are experts with advanced degrees."
passes the test for "real substance"?
read both, and any other favored news service. read a small sample of their coverage and their self-serving motives jump right out of the page and slaps you silly like a rubber chicken. it's that obvious. and it is their problem, by association, since you're trying to make a (unsubstantiated) claim on reputation.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y agoGP made an argument regarding Ars being staffed by experts. You've said nothing at all specific to Ars and instead tried to imply a bunch of guilt by association, so absolutely the original post had considerably more substance than, if I can paraphrase, "lots of the media lies therefore Ars does too" and "they are a business".
- clairity 4y agothere is no argument there. just an unsupported assertion. just like your comment.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y agoSorry, I guess I've been giving your tangential assertions too much benefit as well then.