> Also, ignoring impact meant that you could actively damage people you did not cared about while pretending ignorance again and again. I definitely agree with

> Also, ignoring impact meant that you could actively damage people you did not cared about while pretending ignorance again and again. I definitely agree with that. I don't think either should be ignored, but weighed against each other. That's pretty close to how our legal system works for a lot of crimes. I'd also argue a person pretending innocence does -not- have good intentions, regardless of what they say.