3 ms·
> For someone so concerned with HN guidelines you didn't seem to mind launching a personal attack against him. I didn't. I never said 'f--koff' or 'you're a id
by srvmshr 4y ago
> For someone so concerned with HN guidelines you didn't seem to mind launching a personal attack against him.
I didn't. I never said 'f--koff' or 'you're a idiotic fanboy' or the likes. Commentor sides Musk strongly enough to dismiss a neutral & not-loaded opinion sufficiently with strongly worded tirade. I told 'writing like this isn't okay' on HN & you could possibly need help with a full disclaimer I am not being sarcastic. And you're faulting me?
Edit: What he said is at least true even if it's not nice sounding
Going strictly by company laws, what Musk is doing is absolutely wrong - starting with SEC episode to the latest dropping of acquisition after purchase agreement. It doesn't matter if Elon isn't my tea-time buddy. By the same yardstick everyone should stop commenting on HN because 99% of the things posted on forums aren't exactly about our work life although we somewhat/vaguely know it.
Please let us not engage in this fault finding & keep discussion civil and interesting. Quoting guidelines:
"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something"
- decremental 4y agoOh come on. You know what you did. Just accept that you were both in the wrong instead of providing these disingenuous defenses. Also I was remarking on the bit you quoted to me which should have been obvious.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]