3 ms·
I believe something around $30b of the $44b is backed personally by Musk Basically all of Musks "money" is in the US, and much of it is even in Delaware Corpor
by fooey 4y ago
I believe something around $30b of the $44b is backed personally by Musk
Basically all of Musks "money" is in the US, and much of it is even in Delaware Corporations. The judge can very easily extract whatever it takes from Musk if it comes to that.
- moralestapia 4y agoIt goes like this: * 13B from a party of banks (i.e. Morgan Stanley and friends), in exchange for who knows what (private equity?) * 12.5B from pretty much the same party of banks but as a loan that takes Musk's TSLA stock as collateral * 21B from Musk itself (idk under what conditions) So he could easily "not afford it" if he wanted to.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoCourts take a real dim view of that kind of game. When a billionaire "can't afford" to pay a court judgment, the courts don't just shrug and say "stuff happens". They know when they're being played, and they can play back a lot harder than Musk can.
- TheCoelacanth 4y agoThat's how he planned to finance it, but I don't see why a court would limit itself to those assets. Unless his net worth drops by about 75%, he can afford it.
- moralestapia 4y ago>but I don't see why a court would limit itself to those assets If the court rules "the deal has to go forward" I don't see why other assets would be considered. Also, Net worth != seizable property. Also, Net worth >> real net worth > realizable assets > seizable assets. To be honest, if Musk were ordered to pay the $44B today, out of his pocket, I don't think he would be able to. All I'm saying is, even if Twitter wins (which I think they will, in the very long end), there's a long road between that decision and having the actual money (or stock or w/e) land in their hands. On top of that, there's no way Musk could go to jail because of this (it'd be very hard to prove there was wrongdoing behind this), so there really is no pressure on him to pay the $44B, he could drag this on foreeeeveeeeeerrrr ...
- TheCoelacanth 4y agoStocks of a corporation incorporated in the US are completely seizeable. If he won't cooperate, he could be jailed for contempt (they don't need to prove wrongdoing during the deal, disobeying a court order is itself enough). They could also probably just send a court order to his stock broker.
- moralestapia 4y agoFair enough, I think you are right on that.
- Someone 4y agoAFAIK, there are two separate deals here, one between Twitter and Musk and one between a collection of banks and Musk. Musk didn’t make the first deal contingent on getting the second one. Having that second deal in place convinced the Twitter board that Musk had the money and the liquidity to pay the amount he offered for Twitter, but otherwise that deal is irrelevant for this case.
- aw1621107 4y agoApparently he changed his financing breakdown on 2022-05-25 [0], so as of now it's $13 billion from banks and the rest himself as far as I know. [0]: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-26/elon-called-off-his-margin-loan https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-05-26/elon-c... (paywall bypass at https://archive.ph/e95rj https://archive.ph/e95rj)