5 ms·
What he said is at least true even if it's not nice sounding. For someone so concerned with HN guidelines you didn't seem to mind launching a personal attack ag
by decremental 4y ago
What he said is at least true even if it's not nice sounding. For someone so concerned with HN guidelines you didn't seem to mind launching a personal attack against him. Maybe just downvote someone instead of trying to give them a psychiatric evaluation.
- srvmshr 4y ago> For someone so concerned with HN guidelines you didn't seem to mind launching a personal attack against him. I didn't. I never said 'f--koff' or 'you're a idiotic fanboy' or the likes. Commentor sides Musk strongly enough to dismiss a neutral & not-loaded opinion sufficiently with strongly worded tirade. I told 'writing like this isn't okay' on HN & you could possibly need help with a full disclaimer I am not being sarcastic. And you're faulting me? Edit: What he said is at least true even if it's not nice sounding Going strictly by company laws, what Musk is doing is absolutely wrong - starting with SEC episode to the latest dropping of acquisition after purchase agreement. It doesn't matter if Elon isn't my tea-time buddy. By the same yardstick everyone should stop commenting on HN because 99% of the things posted on forums aren't exactly about our work life although we somewhat/vaguely know it. Please let us not engage in this fault finding & keep discussion civil and interesting. Quoting guidelines: "Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something"
- decremental 4y agoOh come on. You know what you did. Just accept that you were both in the wrong instead of providing these disingenuous defenses. Also I was remarking on the bit you quoted to me which should have been obvious.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]