2 ms·
> Starting a fire would be easy, not obvious and devastating. I'm not sure how starting a fire would be non-obvious but, in general, fire prevention, detectio
by almog 4y ago
> Starting a fire would be easy, not obvious and devastating.
I'm not sure how starting a fire would be non-obvious but, in general, fire prevention, detection and suppression a risk that space crews are well trained to deal with, regardless of sabotage.
> It wouldn't be difficult to have the gun be completely unavailable until landing.
Agree, but:
1. That is not the case that's described here.
2. My argument was to counter the claim that having access to a gun onboard a spaceship does not significantly increase the overall risk to crew members.