I really don't see that. At the very start they say > That said, our experience, use cases, and needs are clearly not those of every user. We aren’t pushing to

I really don't see that. At the very start they say > That said, our experience, use cases, and needs are clearly not those of every user. We aren’t pushing to directly build consensus on these points. Rather, this is presented as a vehicle to advertise our needs from C++ as a high-performance systems language. The point of the non-goals is simply stating things they don't care about, which is pretty reasonable. After all, it's easy to say what you want, but what are you willing to give up for it?