3 ms·
They state that they have arranged for their employees to leave on 31st of december. Fuel-wise, months are feasible. And exit from atomic phase-out is not feas
by a3w 4y ago
They state that they have arranged for their employees to leave on 31st of december.
Fuel-wise, months are feasible. And exit from atomic phase-out is not feasible in the short term.
One source, yet three answers here that say the source is mostly wrong by telling half-truths.
- fsiefken 4y agoWhat are the "half-truths" in the public commentary of Preussenelektra?
- a3w 4y agoRunning at the start of next year means not using up the nuclear fuel now. The owner of the plant is someone a level higher in the hierarchy than the statement giver in the video, and he/they said, that they do not want to run the plant. Technically it is feasible, says the interviewee. But it would cost the owner money, so the company actually has no interest unless they get compensated, by a lot: the nuclear phase-out means they make the profits, payed by the state, without cost and risk of actually running the plant. If they cannot phase it out, they have costs, and would not be eligible for the phase-out deal money.