3 ms·
Ok so two points somewhat mollified depending on geography and ecology, if you happen to live somewhere with trillions of acres of land with ample rivers then y
by throwaway4aday 4y ago
Ok so two points somewhat mollified depending on geography and ecology, if you happen to live somewhere with trillions of acres of land with ample rivers then you're A-OK but if you instead are somewhere with only a few major rivers and higher population density you're up the creek so to speak. What about the rest?
- b112 4y agoThis is why I said not for Germany. I don't see the rest as major issues. Again, power lines through a tiny tiny tiny fraction of nature are not a biggie. I just always have to compare... coal? Weird plans to pump CO2 underground, as if it'll never escape? I prefer dams over nuclear. Beavers cause more change on rivers than our dams. But I am not against nuclear!