5 ms·
IMO even from the 'nosebleeds' a live game is better than the TV experience, because you can see all the action. The broadcast version generally follows the bal
by allturtles 4y ago
IMO even from the 'nosebleeds' a live game is better than the TV experience, because you can see all the action. The broadcast version generally follows the ball, so you can never see what the runners are doing.
- bombcar 4y agoOne of the best remote experiences I have had was very early on with MLB.tv where somehow we got access to all cameras in the stadium; you could pick the one you wanted to watch, or even open up multiple flash windows. It was kind of amazing.
- TigeriusKirk 4y agoI don't know why this isn't the standard pro sports streaming experience. At least I can watch NFL game replays on All-22 cam, though it's delayed several days for some reason.
- bombcar 4y agoI suspect it isn't common because of advertising (still) - at some point it may become an option but they'll want their advertising. For MLB it was working explicitly because MLB.tv did NOT get advertising at all, during commercial breaks you could watch the cameramen wander around and look at the stands, heh.