In general, I don't like the idea of breaking the anonymity, and I haven't checked the reviews posted about Zuru, but the tough question is, should you/a compan

In general, I don't like the idea of breaking the anonymity, and I haven't checked the reviews posted about Zuru, but the tough question is, should you/a company have the right to break anonymity for factually inaccurate statements. As a publicly elected official, I have had someone lie about me at a public meeting. An accusation which if true, would certainly inhibit my ability to get re-elected. Since it was in public, I could find the person who said it and got a public retraction at the next meeting. Thankfully these occurrences are few and far between, but doesn't diminish the question about the rights of the target. But what if this accusation was posted anonymously and I could not find the the accuser? Should I be allowed to get the name from the site?