3 ms·
We can agree on that. My point was not that the current model is a good one, but rather that its problem is not one of generating wealth but rather one of dist
by cassianoleal 4y ago
We can agree on that.
My point was not that the current model is a good one, but rather that its problem is not one of generating wealth but rather one of distributing it, which you just demonstrated as well.
I guarantee you, I was not defending the current focus on developing /latifúndios/ at the expense of everything else.
- ratww 4y agoAh perfect, then we're in agreement. A lot of people assume I'm being a radical and saying Brazil should stop exporting meat/soy/etc. I'm not. What I'm saying is that Brazil needs is a plan that's not simply "keep fucking the country even though it's not really working". I'm not a fan of people from richer countries saying "Brazil should keep doing what it seems to want to do", because this is also way too favourable to them.
- cassianoleal 4y agoI'm not a fan of richer (or poorer!) countries saying much of anything about what other countries should or should not do. :) Everyone is biased. Everyone is hypocritical to some degree. We should find common ground, not impose or be imposed on.
- ratww 4y agoAgree. I think it's kinda easy to find common ground, but everyone should be allowed a voice. With the "shut up, let Brazil destroy forests, we did it too", the only people that seem to be getting a voice are politically-correct privileged people from rich countries (who want to keep taking advantage of Brazil), criminals in Brazil destroying the forest and the corrupt current Brazilian government.