3 ms·
This is also "sins of the father" style reasoning. The fact that other people did a thing in the past doesn't mean I agree or support it. I have ancestors who f
by roflc0ptic 4y ago
This is also "sins of the father" style reasoning. The fact that other people did a thing in the past doesn't mean I agree or support it. I have ancestors who fought with the confederacy; does this mean I shouldn't be opposed to human trafficking in 2022? I think that would be an unreasonable jump to make.
- ratww 4y agoExactly. This is a very weak argument for something that is so damaging as letting the forest be destroyed for what is virtually zero economical gain to the population.