4 ms·
^3) If I lived in the US I'd be more concerned about the ubiquity of HFCS and animal growth hormones than because imported honey may have been purified. TFA als
by epo 15y ago
^3) If I lived in the US I'd be more concerned about the ubiquity of HFCS and animal growth hormones than because imported honey may have been purified. TFA also has the xenophobic suggestion that the pollen filtering is done by the Chinese, perhaps (and more likely) it is done by, or at the behest of, US importers?
Filtering out pollen may hide the origin, but surely people concerned about health should be testing for contaminants not pollen? This article seems to be screaming "OMG the Chinese are sending us their honey!"
EDIT: this 'news site' is the mouth piece for a lawfirm. This is good old fashioned protectionism mixed with xenophobic mud slinging propagated by some all-American legal vultures.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- user24 15y ago> this 'news site' is the mouth piece for a lawfirm nice, how'd you find that out? edit: right, yeah the domain is owned by Marler Clark LLP - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marler_Clark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marler_Clark for an extensive list of sites owned by them.