4 ms·
You're just arguing over language to avoid addressing the question. Imagine he said "bad parent" instead of "deadbeat". Also, per the numbers time spent carin
by throwaway0a5e 4y ago
You're just arguing over language to avoid addressing the question. Imagine he said "bad parent" instead of "deadbeat".
Also, per the numbers time spent caring for children has tripled since the 60s and child rearing outcomes don't seem better at the same time as women have entered the workforce. Since society didn't also invent some magic stimulants that reduce sleep requirements in that time that's a bad deal no matter how you look at it. We're wasting more time to get the same amount done.
- em-bee 4y agohow do you make the connection that childrearing didn't get better since women entered the workforce? according to those statistics, women doubled the time they spend with kids. seems that working didn't make a difference. i don't know what that means though. either women were already working in the 60's or while they were at home they did many other things besides taking care of the children. (i suppose some housework got more efficient thanks to technical advances)