> And you did resort to a logical fallacy in that. False. You should read my comment again or at least a few more times to understand the (relatively simple) p

> And you did resort to a logical fallacy in that. False. You should read my comment again or at least a few more times to understand the (relatively simple) point I was trying to make. I was saying you couldn't employ ad hominem against Penrose because it was not easy for you to do so.