4 ms·

Good lord no, just no. Computer Science is not going to be the method to "complete physics." "Complete physics" isn't even a sensible phrase. Source: me, (forme

• westurner 4y ago
  Evolutionary algorithm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_algorithm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_algorithm Related techniques > Particle swarm optimization: > Particle swarm optimization is based on the ideas of animal flocking behaviour.[7] Also primarily suited for numerical optimization problems Symbolic EA will surpass all of human physics in the next 10 years. To complete physics, which spacetime predictions can or must have zero error?
  • sidlls 4y ago
    The notion that physics can ever be complete is...not even wrong.
    • postalrat 4y ago
      Prove it.
      • adastra22 4y ago
        Prove physics can be completed. There will always be higher energies, or greater or smaller scales to explore.
        • bowsamic 4y ago
          If we can account for every phenomenon that occurs within the scales that we can observe then we can probably claim that physics is complete. Unfortunately it seems that even that might be impossible
          • sidlls 4y ago
            No, we can’t claim that. It would still be at best an approximation. Perhaps more accurate and/or precise than what we’ve got now, but an approximation nonetheless. We’ve long ago given up on even getting close to what you propose anyway.
            • bowsamic 4y ago
              I’m saying it would be a reasonable definition of complete, and no we absolutely have not given up on a theory of all phenomena
      • peteradio 4y ago
        Bazinga.
        • westurner 4y ago
          Perhaps the oracle could indicate when the Career().solve_physics() routine will halt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]