4 ms·
SJR ranked the journal in the top third - not great, but not "fourth tier." And it got published, unlike your rebuttal. It's also got 170+ citations, none of
by ChrisLomont 4y ago
SJR ranked the journal in the top third - not great, but not "fourth tier."
And it got published, unlike your rebuttal.
It's also got 170+ citations, none of which I found to claim to debunk the paper. Many of those citations are in good journals.
Do you know any papers published in good journals rebutting this one?
Maybe you should carefully write up your objections and publish that. You certainly are going to great lengths to claim it's crap.
- biophysboy 4y agoIt’s also super common to use memorable names and phrases in scientific literature/presentations. It’s common in my field (biophysics). I don’t know why “blue zone” is so pseudoscientific.