3 ms·
I think we can separate innovation from growth. I think we can agree that we have resource limitations (whether it be livable space or ploughable land). Moder
by mc32 4y ago
I think we can separate innovation from growth.
I think we can agree that we have resource limitations (whether it be livable space or ploughable land).
Modern economies work on the premise of growing markets. Whether creating new markets or taking over old markets. With a steady state or shrinking population, you can value add and you can innovate, but there are no new "China market(s)" to expand into. If growth were not fundamental, then companies would not look to expand beyond their borders (whether local, regional, national or international).
How would companies in modern economies survive if they should predict shrinking markets? Consumerism buys you some time (you need the iPhone umpteenth), at some point a hammer is good enough --with corner-case exceptions.
- pyuser583 4y agoI don’t agree that there are absolute resource restrictions. Matter doesn’t become a resource unless it’s economically useful. 5 kilotons of cadmium may or not be a resource depending on your business. The world is full of ex resources we haven’t exhausted. There’s no shortage of bat guano or saltpeter. Mercury used to be vital, now it’s value is usually negative. There’s plenty of raw matter that’s useless now that will he extremely valuable in the future. And will eventually have awkward afterlife as an ex-resource. Like bat guano.