I can come up with an argument against this. You have no major premise. All you have are two minors premises and two conclusions: * X actions ought not to be d

I can come up with an argument against this. You have no major premise. All you have are two minors premises and two conclusions: * X actions ought not to be done, forced organ donation is a type of X action, therefore forced organ donations ought not to be done. * X actions ought not to be done, forbidding abortion (like forced organ donation is an X action) is a type of X action, therefore forbidding abortion ought not to be done. But what is X category of actions!?! Is it: * Violations of autonomy? * Deprivations of moral agency? * Distracting the proletariat from organizing against the capitalist class (why abortion was first legalized!)? * Causing greater pain and suffering than it relieves? You never actually take a position on why forcing organ donation is bad. It simply sounds bad, and scares people, so it must be bad. Why is forced organ donation wrong?