No, you are presenting a non-sequitur, I am bringing up the fact that the government imposes requirements for businesses and government to make accommodations f

No, you are presenting a non-sequitur, I am bringing up the fact that the government imposes requirements for businesses and government to make accommodations for the disabled. This is in fact to provide equity via governmental means. This occurs at a cost to the organization providing the service. You are arguing about an extreme where everyone is flattened (via cleaving or dystopian sci-fi), which does not happen under the ADA. I actually never indicated support for that position (or any position in fact) you are essentially straw manning. My point is that the government in fact does this via legislation (the ADA), are you willing to argue against it to remain consistent?