3 ms·
IMO, the rights of the child only exist after it is not wholly dependent on the mother's life to exist (ie. an actual child, not a fetus.) Which means that a de
by geekbird 4y ago
IMO, the rights of the child only exist after it is not wholly dependent on the mother's life to exist (ie. an actual child, not a fetus.) Which means that a dead fetus has no rights, and a fetus that would kill the mother isn't even a person, much less a person with the right to kill the pregnant person.
- Spooky23 4y agoI’ve had the bad fortune of actually being in situations with these types of scenarios twice. Personally, I’m pro-choice because I don’t think the law should make these decisions, as they are difficult, situational things that have nuance. I find aspects of abortion horrifying, but I respect that it’s none of my business.
- josephcsible 4y ago> a fetus that would kill the mother isn't even a person How would you apply this to Gianna Emanuela? Do you think that she wasn't a person even well past when she was viable?