> It easily captures compelling parents for organ donation using the same voluntary sex mechanism we're examining for forced births. Should parents be compelled

> It easily captures compelling parents for organ donation using the same voluntary sex mechanism we're examining for forced births. Should parents be compelled to donate their organs to their children when not doing so would result in the recipient's death? If you're really deeply committed to this analogy, we would have to suppose a world in which everyone knows that voluntary sex produces children with an organ deficiency which can only be satisfied by a donation from one parent. > At this point we've added mode of consequence to the analogy, but it seems you're introducing yet another constraint: active and passive intervention. I'm afraid I'll have to stop this here. It appears as though you will continue adding complexity until with the intention of forcing your result. Sorry, I don't debate with people acting in bad faith. Pointing out that your analogy fails to capture the relevant dynamics isn't "acting in bad faith". EDIT: Removed some snark.