3 ms·

with all due respect your religious beliefs are irrelevant to the discussion and have no place in a discussion about people's rights to health care being revoke

• csours 4y ago
  People vote based on their beliefs. It's not common for people to separate their beliefs based on how they came to believe them. That is: I got my morals and beliefs and political leanings from the people I'm around, and there's not a clear demarcation in my mind between them.
• gruez 4y ago
  >in a discussion about people's rights to health care being revoked by an unelected minority. I don't know, this seems like a "live by the sword, die by the sword" situation to me. Either you recognize the authority of the "unelected minority", or you don't. You can't support their legitimacy when it suits you, and oppose their legitimacy when it doesn't.
  • zzzeek 4y ago
    and that's why most of the Republican party tried to overthrow the election in 2020, including the wife of Clarence Thomas who continued to rule on cases relevant to the overthrow attempt. Spare me the lecturing. not to mention Mitch McConnell stole a supreme court seat.
    • gruez 4y ago
      >and that's why most of the Republican party tried to overthrow the election in 2020 including the wife of Clarence Thomas who continued to rule on cases relevant to the overthrow attempt 1. Can you link to some cases where you believe that the court has ruled inappropriately? 2. even if we somehow accept that Thomas should be disqualified from serving, the ruling would still be 5-3 in support of overturning it. >not to mention Mitch McConnell stole a supreme court seat. explain.