3 ms·
Your entire argument is an attempt to spin something that is widely seen as necessary, that is, access to abortion, into a side discussion about your personal d
by ohgodplsno 4y ago
Your entire argument is an attempt to spin something that is widely seen as necessary, that is, access to abortion, into a side discussion about your personal dislike for not paying for your kids. Aside from being a pretty awful parallel to make, giving people access to only having the kids they want lowers the chance of them financially abandoning them.
- ameister14 4y agoI believe you have wildly misunderstood my entire argument. I was attempting to respond to something I have seen argued many times by men, including the literal comment I replied to here, which I paraphrase as 'if a woman gets to abort then a man should also get a say and so should be able to financially abort.' I disagree with this, a woman should be able to get an abortion but a man should not 'in the interest of fairness' get a right to financially abrogate their responsibility. It's not a man's right to choose.