I know who he is and where he's worked. But authority != always right The vision held a lot more than just swiping on glass, there were spacially aware device

I know who he is and where he's worked. But authority != always right The vision held a lot more than just swiping on glass, there were spacially aware devices, proximity networking, augmented reality... But that's not vision worthy... because the ipad already exists!? People are talking like, if you get a vision wrong (at the start) the whole journey is pointless. I'm saying, we can always change the things that don't work. If interacting with glass stops working out... we can ditch that for something better. Just like the iPhone/iPad doesn't fold in the middle (like the knowledge navigator vision presented).